UCLA falls to Memphis

April 6, 2008

It’s always sad when the team you root for ends its season with a loss. It’s even more sad when this year more than any other was the year I had hope of UCLA winning a championship.

Don’t get me wrong — even with the loss to Memphis on Saturday, I still consider the 2007-08 season to be a success. Going to the Final Four is extremely difficult, no matter how talented you are, and well over 300 other teams would love to be in UCLA’s position right now. The Bruins went 35-4, winning over 90% of their games, which is impressive in any season in any sport. At a personal level, they were also extremely fun to watch with so many talented players, great defense and so many thrilling, close and come-from-behind wins.

But it’s still sad and frustrating that UCLA couldn’t get past Memphis. Frustrating because unlike UCLA’s other three losses this year, the Bruins just got dominated. Memphis was the better team, and is athletic and talented at every single position. They deserved to win that game. The game probably shouldn’t have been as close it was.

At the end of the game, when I was expecting UCLA to go on a run to win the game like they usually do, Memphis stepped up their defense. UCLA played well defensively — but Memphis was even better, shutting down UCLA when it counted the most.

It’s going to be a long offseason. I believe in coach Ben Howland and the players on UCLA enough to know that the Bruins will be back in the Final Four in the near-future and eventually win a championship. It’s just too bad we couldn’t see one this year.

About these ads

3 Responses to “UCLA falls to Memphis”

  1. Larry Brown Says:

    Memphis was the better team, and is athletic and talented at every single position. They deserved to win that game. The game probably shouldn’t have been as close it was.

    As much as that is the proper thing to say in the name of sportsmanship, I really can’t say I agree with it. I still really feel we were the better team and that we could take them. I really question some of our gameplan, which is to say running with them in a fast-paced style, and not getting the ball inside to Love when Dorsey had three fouls early in the 2nd half. Things could have been different, and I really think we underachieved.

    I do agree however, that putting everything in perspective, this was a successful season, and it’s been a great run the past three years. With the exception of another banner, I don’t see how any UCLA fan can be anything less than ecstatic about where the program is these days.


  2. [...] game and Rose and CDR for making so many of their shots and free throws, I cannot in all sincerity call Memphis the better team. I do not believe that is the case. I believe they had their way with UCLA, but the Bruins were two [...]

  3. Gilbert Says:

    Larry, of course UCLA could’ve won — but I think if the two teams were to play a seven-game series, Memphis would’ve won four or maybe five of them.

    It’s good to know I’m not the only one who thinks the season is a success despite not winning a title.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: