I’m still here
March 25, 2009
I intend to resume blogging here regularly in the next few days, I’ve just been either busy or out of town lately.
In the meantime, I’ve added another blog to my Angels blogroll, Everyday Life, written by Ashley Thompson, the wife of Rich Thompson. As usual, Rev Halofan of Halos Heaven found this before I did.
Reading Everyday Life, where Ashley has so far blogged about what life is like being a wife of a major-leaguer in Spring Training, is a must-read for any baseball fan who wants to know more about the inner-workings of the Angels and baseball life. Here’s hoping Ashley keeps it up.
Gary Matthews, Jr. mistakenly thinks he’s good
March 16, 2009
“My goal is to play every day,” Matthews said. “I hope that’s here. “I don’t intend to sit around and play a couple times a week like last year.”
Gary, let’s make a deal. You agree to dramatically reduce your bloated contract (which has 3 years, $33 million left), and the Angels will do their best to trade you to a team that will play you everyday.
The Angels have at least four better outfielders than Matthews (Vlad, Abreu, Hunter, Rivera, maybe Willits, and Figgins can play OF too). Does he really think he’s going to play every day?
(Hat-tip to Halos Heaven)
UCLA 6 seed in Philly?
March 16, 2009
Could there have been a worst scenario for UCLA on Selection Sunday than playing a good mid-major in the first round and potentially playing a 3 seed in their home city in the second round?
I’m back, my Angels posts will be here now
March 12, 2009
I wrote my last post about the Angels over at Bugs & Cranks today.
What this means is:
1) My blogging about the Angels will be here now
2) I’ll be here much more often, hopefully
I enjoyed my time at Bugs & Cranks, and they were good to me. Also, I’ve neglected this blog over the past year or so, it’s time to revive it.
You’ve probably noticed I changed the site design. It’s been a year with the old one, time to mix it up. Why not?
Scenarios for UCLA to get the #1 seed
March 6, 2009
There is still a chance UCLA can win the Pac-10 and get the #1 seed at the Pac-10 Tournament.
All it takes is:
UCLA beats Oregon
Washington State beats Washington
However, there are different reasons for why UCLA would win the tiebreaker, depending on the Cal/Arizona State result.
Scenario #1: Cal beats ASU
This would put UCLA and Washington tied for first at 13-5, with the first tiebreaker being head-to-head, where the teams split. The next tiebreaker would be results against the next best team, which in this case would be Cal, finishing third. UCLA swept Cal, Cal swept Washington, so UCLA would get the #1 seed
Scenario #2: Arizona State beats Cal
In this scenario, UCLA and UW would be tied at 13-5 and would still be tied in the first tiebreaker, head-to-head. Cal and Arizona State would be tied for third at 11-7 and under Pac-10 rules, you take head-to-head results against tied teams as a group, and UCLA and Washington both went 2-2 against these schools. So the next tiebreakers would be head-to-head results against the next best team. Both UCLA and Washington would’ve split against Washington State, split against Arizona, swept USC, swept Oregon State, swept Stanford and swept Oregon.
Here’s the Pac-10 tiebreaker rules I copied out of their media guide (PDF):
1. Two-team tie
a. Results of head-to-head competition during the regular season.
b. Each team’s record vs. the team occupying the highest position in the final regular standings, and then continuing down through the standings
until one team gains an advantage.
When arriving at another group of tied teams while comparing records, use each team’s record against the collective tied teams as a group (prior
to that group’s own tie-breaking procedure), rather than the performance against individual tied teams.
c. Won-lost percentage against all Division I opponents.
d. Coin toss conducted by the Commissioner or designee.
a) and b) would be even as I established already. For the whole season, UCLA would be 24-7 and Washington would be 23-8, so UCLA would get the #1 seed by tiebreaker c).
And to think, with one more non-conference win from Washington or one more non-conference loss from UCLA, this could’ve gone to a coin toss.